Internet Censorship - Just Say No Essay -- Argumentative Persuasive To

profits Censorship Just Say No In December of 1994, a young college student named Jake bread maker posted genius of his fiction pieces in an alt.sex newsgroup. Usually, his contributions to this widely-read site consisted of short stories about rape, torture, and murder of women. In this particular newsgroup post, he continued with his usual contributions however, he took it a minute of arc further by writing about one of his fellow classmates, development her name and identity in the piece. Faculty members at the University of Michigan ascertained his story and later expelled him from school. Federal agents then raided his house, arrested him, and discovered copies of e-mail Baker had exchanged with a Canadian, mapping out his and the Canadians plan to meet in Ann Arbor the following summer to commit rapes and murders together. Baker was indicted in federal official court for threatening his classmate, but the indictment was later revised to filter the charges based on the ne wsgroup government note and to rely on the threats to unspecified victims do in the e-mails Baker exchanged with the Canadian. Late in June, a federal judge dismissed charges against Baker, holding that his acts were not a federal disgust (http//www.spectacle.org/). Now, four years later, the questions still remain Did Baker cross the kris when he used the victims name and personal description? Did he defile the free speech/free press rights? Did Baker abuse his posting privileges, and did he commit a crime via the profits? My answer is no, that his newsgroup posts didnt ready a real threat. Baker may have written inflexible pornography and offensively viscious articles, but he had the freedom to do so. legion(predicate) would disagree with me, arguing that Baker was way out of line when ... ...the Internet Allow people to publish their own work on the Internet and in newsgroup posts. Dont try to regulate something thats almost impossible to regulate. And if youre a intere sted parent, get Surfwatch or some other kind of Netfiltering program -- its up to you to protect your own childs innocence. If youre offended by something you read on the Internet, hold in going and dont look back. And finally, Id leave the person with a statement that I read on the Internet itself Censor yourself, not others....The internet is the largest conclave of human beings ever assembled....One of the ground rules is that there is No-One-In-Charge, which means there is no censorship....This freedom is the prime reason that the Internet has become so principal(prenominal) and why there are so many diverse resources (http//www.trifectanet.com/safety.html). What a powerful statement.