Wednesday, December 12, 2018
'Social Care Theory for Practice\r'
'SOCIAL anxiety THEORY FOR PRACTICE (OUTCOME 1) ASSESSMENT 1(1500 words approx. ) (12th October 2012) coco J Hendry summon 1Introduction Page 2 â⬠5Assessment Page6Conclusion Page 7Reference/Bibliography 1 The following essay exit face my understanding of the splendor and relevance of range to amicable palm by explaining how intumesce-disposed forethought determine and principles influence rehearse. I will then explain what relationship my value base has with neighborly c atomic number 18 values.I will offer and explanation of my understanding of the bourn anti- invidious shape and provide some causes of how I would concord this in a brotherly forethought setting. I will outline the principle, which underpins anti-discriminatory practice and how this would influence my sustain practice. 2 All mete out doers require recognising the wideness of the cardinal core values for misgiving practice as suggested by ââ¬Å"Janet miller and Susan Gibb rush in c onsecrate 2nd random variable 2007ââ¬Â the value of esteem for the worth of dignity of every individual. he value of according favorable justice and promoting the mixer well- cosmos of every individual. Adopting and implementing these values recognises that each individual assist exploiter needs are met soci everyy, physically, emotionally, cognitively without stereotyping, pre-judging or discriminating the inspection and repair user, according to ââ¬Å"Janet Miller and Susan Gibb negociate in Practice 2nd edition 2007ââ¬Â The two core values appear to be overriding to both the service user and carer.It becomes solve that the employment of the two core values enables the service user to realise their beneficial potential and advocates promoting affectionate offb have of each individual. Because of the carer, applying the values without doubt contri thoes the principles of complaisant care values achieved; ââ¬Å" affable care values are underpinned by the pri nciples of dignity, privacy, choice, safety, realise full potential and compare and diversityââ¬Â www. sssc. com My own values were primarily because of my family and my social surroundings.The social skills and values adopted at an too soon age enabled me to progress through school, social bases and friends. Adopting lower-ranking values, shaped by culture, rules and values particular to social influences and settings Some aspects of the secondary values are an meter reading that as a member of a school society, the expectations is to conform and adhere to indisputable rules, regulation, and care the alike(p) view as my peers, not unlike the social care values.My values have been changed and evolved from all areas of my life, moreover the values learned from my family when younger have dictated the foundations for what I deem ââ¬Ëacceptable and ââ¬Ëunacceptable This is called elementary socialisation. My family were 3 my primary socialisation, they taught me w hat was ââ¬Ëright or ââ¬Ëwrong and what an acceptable way to behave or conduct myself was and what was unacceptable. Although my values have changed with time these washbowlonical values learned from my family have remained.My own values along with the social care values and principles will enable me approach all service users as individuals in a skipper, competent manner. However different or multicultural we may be doesnââ¬â¢t always mean we are diverse and unselfish in our approach to specialized groups, cultures, religions, etceteraHaving been subjected to direct/collateral prejudicesââ¬â¢, I am mindful to intend all members of society and strive not prejudge people, and to avert unlikeness at all cost.Certain standards are expect in a standards expected of social care workers that were first published in the ââ¬Å"Regulation of Care (Scotland) Act 2001ââ¬Â A key standard underpinning social care is ââ¬Ëanti discriminatory practiceââ¬â¢ which mea t that as a social care worker I should not treat some(prenominal)body differently unheeding of their, gender, sexuality, age, disability, political, religious spiritual beliefs. It is strategic as a social careworker to ge bring up if I have both values or sights that could be considered as prejudiced.Having an opinion of a certain individual or group based on hearsay, stereotypes or assumptions and without knowing them in person is a prejudice. As stated in ââ¬Å"HNC Social Care (2009) by Bingham et al ââ¬Å"Prejudices can be categorised into personal prejudices, cultural prejudices and societal/ geomorphological prejudicesââ¬Â and although some prejudices could be considered positive to some people, roughly prejudices are negative and if acted upon will result in discrimination. Social care is an integral part of any society; practice and formula are a fundamental part of our society and social services.Promoting and applying the Codes of Practice and principles aim s to educate care workers, providers and 4 service users. Anti-discrimination laws and acts such as the Equality Act 2010 and the Disability disparity Act 2005 enable us to aware of legislation and the need to adhere to the codes of conduct which regulate the social care profession. Working in a social care environment would require me to regularly recapitulation my own personal values or opinions and to consider at all times the social care values and codes.Keeping up to date with current legislation would ensure I am compliant, not prejudging or stereotyping service users. It is also important to reflect and consider whether I could have approached a similar locating differently with a certain individual compared to others, and if there was any differences why? Having personally experienced discrimination, I appreciate the negative effects discrimination can have on an individual and understand the importance and application of anti-discrimination laws and legislation. The SS SC have an extensive books called ââ¬Ë induction guidance for social care workers in Scotlandââ¬Â.This literature includes the principles and values expected of social care workers but also makes fleet the relevant legislation that is specific to my role to assist me in implementing ââ¬Ëanti discriminatory practiceââ¬Â, such legislation includes; * Disability favoritism Act 1995 * Human Rights Act 1998 * Sex contrariety Act 1975 * Race Relations Act 1976 and 2000 It is important to review such legislation as what I may consider to be only an opinion that is harmless and inoffensive to all may rattling be considered as discriminatory 5 by others whether direct or indirect discrimination.Direct discrimination is slowly identifiable and blunt, using race discrimination as an example direct discrimination in a social care setting would be individual of a different cultural or heathenish background being treated less favourably than someone of the same culture who ma y share similar society/structural beliefs. Indirect discrimination is less direct but equally offensive, an example of indirect discrimination in a social care setting would be a social care provider ignoring religious and cultural beliefs by expecting a ââ¬Ëmuslimââ¬â¢ service user to eat during the daylight hours at Ramadan.Although the legislation does not state each individual requirement of a certain group or individual, it does make it more than clear what is unacceptable. According to ââ¬Å"Bingham et al (HNC Social Care Scotland)2009ââ¬Â these legislative guidelines promote positive practice across the domain and also empower workers to ensure they are support to carry out their duties with robust policies and proceduresââ¬Â. By adhering to the SSCC codes of practice and also regularly reviewing relevant laws surrounding discrimination I should be more than equipped to show ââ¬Ëanti-discriminatory social care ââ¬Ë. From my essay, you will see I have stu died the values and principles that influence practice. In view of this, I now have a clearer understanding of my own values as well as the social care values and principles recognising and realising the general impact they have when employ in a social care environment. In a professional capacity, it is crucial that social service workers are protect and regulated by the Codes of Conduct. The codes are a clear guide of the standards required to work in a social care environment.The codes of practice and principles provides employees, employers and service users a with clear set of standards, ensuring regulation and guidelines are applied in a consistent, compassionate manner. Regulation and dead body in the application of the Codes of Conduct and principles throughout the care profession will result in the service users being provided with the appropriate choices and services they require. In my opinion, being able to make informed choices regardless of age, gender, disability, s exuality, religion, etc. n a safe environment by care workers who have empowered them to realise their full potential is possible when all aspects of personal and social care values, laws and legislation are applied. 7 REFERENCES/BIBLIOGRAPHY Janet Miller and Susan GibbàCare in Practice 2nd edition 2007 publishing firm:àHodder Arnold, (2ndàedition 2007). Bingham, àE. (2009) HNC Social Care Scotland Publisher:àHeinemann; 1 edition (6 Novà2009)àââ¬Â¦ www. sssc. uk. com www. scotland . gov. uk\r\n'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment