Censorship Will Destroy the Internet Essay -- Argumentative Persuasive

Censorship Will Destroy the cyberspace Depending on whether or not youre a net geek homogeneous me, you probably know either everything or nothing about Senate flier 314, the Communications Decency Act. (Im a huge net geek Ive already accredited at least three copies of an on-line petition against it.) Senate bill 314, proposed by Senator Exon and currently under consideration in the Senate, would ban raunch on-line, making it a federal crime to transmit or turn over available over the net anything determined to be obscene...regardless of whether the maker of such communication placed the call or initiated the communication. This ban includes all forms of electronic communication, from teleph i calls to file transfer protocol sites (computers on the internet that bar files available to the public for copying) to private e-mail messages. In the original magnetic declination of the bill, penalties also applied to internet service providers (including universities) whose faci lities were used for obscene communication theory however, after heavy lobbying by CompuServe, America On-Line, and early(a) large internet services, those portions of the bill were stricken. Even in its weakened form, though, Senate bill 314 poses a prodigious threat to the continued growth of the internet and to constitutional rights. Perhaps the depression problem with the law is that it is completely unnecessary, and its authorship clearly indicates that its authors are unacquainted with(predicate) with the nature of the internet. Pornography on the internet is accessible, but only to those who go looking for it. Images do not appear unsolicited on the individualised computers of internet users, so this law will not do anything at all for the user who does not actively seek pornographic mate... ...among other things, an experiment in anarchism a group of independent, free individuals acting without obsession and defining their own rules. The internet is exciting because there is no aboriginal authority to decide what is and is not allowed, who can talk and who cannot. This freedom is one of the intangible features that makes the internet a wonder of the modern world. Senate bill 314 seeks to degrade that freedom with artificially imposed guidelines it seeks to impose an authority where there has been none and where the citizens do not want or need one. This is mayhap the virtually destructive feature of Senator Exons proposal it would corrupt the atmosphere of freedom that many another(prenominal) net users find so enticing. If Senator Exon spent some season on-line, perhaps he could understand how precious this experiment really this, and perhaps he would not be so quick to end it.